Mapping 2016’s QSOs

Playing with Log4OM, I figured out how to isolate qso’s by band, date range, and mode and plot them accordingly on Google Earth. I learned something about propagation, or rather I could see that with a years worth of data collected, my qso experience correlates to the principles of propagation by band I read about.img_2049-001

  • I had 426 cw qso’s on five hf bands last year
    • 22 on 80M
    • 117 on 40M
    • 48 on 30M
    • 143 on 20M
    • 78 on 17M
  • Though often I operate from multiple qth’s, for all of these my qth was in the District of Columbia, the northern-western half of Virginia or eastern Maryland. For 95% of the qso’s I operated in a triangle with angles roughly at Pittsburgh, DC, and Charlottesville, VA.
    • Generality verified: the longer the wave length, the closer the qso’s.
    • There are multiple exceptions – like the qso to Madagascar on 80M.
  • The qso’s were split nearly 50/50 between qrp and 100W.
    • qrp is disproportionately high on 20M and 40M because of my SOTA-activating.

Here they are listed in increasing frequency of band. What you can see are North America and Europe, which is where nearly all of my contacts have been.

Any other observations?

80 Meters

n3ii-2016-80m

40 Meters

n3ii-2016-40m

30 Meters

n3ii-2016-30m

20 Meters

n3ii-2016-20m

17 Meters

n3ii-2016-17m

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s